Lippenbroek Regulated Tidal Exchange Scheme, Belgium

Climate zone
cool temperate moist
Type
Actual Test Site
Light or indepth?
Light
Monitoring impacts effects
1
Monitoring parameters
Accretion or erosion on site; tidal levels and velocities; creek morphology; suspended solids; soil nutrients; water quality (incl. metals); light climate; bioturbation; invertebrates; vegetation; birds; fish;
Performance impact estimation method
Unknown
Application scale
River
Installation date
2006
Lifespan
100
Age
8
Performance timescale
< 1 year
Area (ha)
10
Design capacity description
40000m3
Constraints
Scheme implementation was slowed by financial aspects and public opinion - consequently the project took a long time to materialise.
Favourable preconditions
The scheme was made possible by a desire for integrated water management.
Public consultation
0
Design contractual arrangement
Arrangement type Responsibility Role Comments Name
Design consultation activity
Activity stage Key issues Name Comments
Design land use change
Land use change type
Design authority
Authority type Role Responsibility Name Comments
Determination of design details of the measure
ABPmer
Monitoring
University of Antwerp, W and Z
Monitoring
Ecosystem Management Research Group
Key lessons
The Controlled Reduced Tide (CRT) technique employed at Lippenbroek has potential applicability for habitat creation along other heavily developed estuaries. It furthermore represents a technique which can significantly reduce the tidal prism of a site, without compromising the development of a range of intertidal habitats, thus minimising potential negative effects on small estuary systems. The technique also enables the establishment of intertidal habitats at lower elevations in the tidal frame than those of intertidal systems fronting a defence, and would thus be of potential use in areas where land levels behind a defence are relatively low compared to fronting levels. However, longer flood duration and low-turbidity stages may lead to higher accretion rates than in adjacent natural systems(ABPmer, 2008).
Success factor(s)
Success factor type Success factor role Comments
Attitude of relevant stakeholders
secondary factor
Financing
Financing type Comments
National funds
Barrier
Barrier type Barrier role Comments
Attitude of the public
secondary barrier
Lacking financing sources
main barrier
Driver
Driver type Driver role Comments
Past flooding events
main driver
Other
Loss of goods and services (loss of intertidal habitats)
Other
loss of ecosystem functions (and thus loss of safety)
Financing share
Financing share type Share Comments
Policy description
Demonstration site, improved flood defence, habitat creation
Part of wider plan
0
Policy target
Target purpose
Peak-flow reduction
Improved Biodiversity
Policy pressure
Pressure directive Relevant pressure
Policy area
Policy area type Policy area focus Name Comments
Policy impact
Impact directive Relevant impact
Policy wider plan
Wider plan type Wider plan focus Name Comments
Policy requirement directive
Requirement directive Specification
Ecosystem improved biodiversity
1
Information on Ecosystem improved biodiversity
With regards to birds, despite the high degree of disruption by humans (including site visitors,cyclists and walkers on the dike), a clear change in the numbers and species of birds using the site could be observed when compared to baseline conditions. Of the 4,089 individuals observed during the first year of monitoring, 30% were benthic foragers (19 species), 54% wetland-generalists (11 species), 8% terrestrial generalists (18 species) and 8% woodland birds (13 species). Occasionally night herons Nycticorax nycticorax and spoonbills Platalea leucorodia were observed feeding (Maris et al., 2008). In order for a CRT to fulfil a role for fish, safe passage of the cluvers/sluices is required.
Ecosystem provisioning services
1
Information on Ecosystem provisioning services
Flood protection
Ecosystem impact climate regulation
No specific impact
Information on Ecosystem impact climate regulation
Not mentioned
Information on retained water
average water exchange volume: neap tide: ~4,000m3 (none on the lower neap tides)
Information on increased water storage
spring tide : ~40,000m3
Water quality overall improvements
N/A info
Information on Water quality overall improvements
With respect to water quality, the oxygen enriching impact, which is mostly due to the high inlet sluices acting as aerators, has been described as †˜striking†™. At the sluices, an immediate increase of up to 60% has been observed and a further 20% enrichment has been attributed to surface oxygenation.
Soil quality overall soil improvements
N/A info
Information on Soil quality overall soil improvements
Biodiversity enhanced
Information on Soil quality, overall soil physical properties
Sedimentation was strongly related to flooding frequency; i.e. the highest sedimentation rate was observed at sites inundated around 85% of the time. The average sedimentation rate is currently fairly high at approximately 4 cm/year. The lowest sites are accreting fastest, hence the polder is loosing slope. Outside the polder, in natural marshes, an increase in elevation would lead to a decrease in flooding frequency, and a consequent gradual decrease in sedimentation. Conversely in the CRT the flooding frequency is not directly coupled to elevation; the intake volume is stipulated by the sluice configuration.

Partners

Logos of all partners of NWRM project