General
National Id
              Latvia_03
          Site name
              Located in L127 and L161  (water bodies codes according to the Lielupe river basin management plan). Located in the nature reserve, Natura 2000 (in Daudzese parish, Jaunjelgava County).
          Summary
              The main goal of the implemented NWRM was to restore natural hydrological regime in drained raised bog Aklais located in nature reserve area being also the Natura 2000 site in Latvia. Building of the dam was chosen as most appropriate method. Due to natural conditions, there was no possibility to use technique thus dams were built by hand. Unfortunately the part of the dams is partly washed out by waters now and in a result raised bog is not restored as expected. The main lesson for future is to use adequate technique and materials to ensure durability of the dams.
          Light or indepth?
              Light
          NUTS Code
              Latvija
          RBD code
              LVLUBA
          Transboundary
              0
          NWRM(s) implemented in the case study
          
      Site information
Climate zone
              cool temperate moist
          Mean annual rainfall
              600 - 900 mm
          Mean rainfall unit
              mm/year
          Average temperature
              6
          Type
              Actual Test Site
          Average slope range
              -
          Vegetation class
              raised bog
          Monitoring maintenance
Monitoring impacts effects
              1
          Monitoring location
              Edge of Field/Plot
          Administrative annual costs
              4100
          Monitoring parameters
              hydrology monitoring,  vegetation/habitat monitoring
          Monitoring upstream station
              -
          Monitoring downstream station
              -
          Performance
Performance impact estimation method
              Catchment outlet
          Performance impact estimation information
              Monitoring of the groundwater level was  carried out in 13 groundwater monitoring well. Vegetation/habitat monitoring was carried out in 35  habitat monitoring plots.
          Design & implementations
Application scale
              Plot
          Installation date
              2012-09
          Age
              2
          Performance timescale
              < 1 year
          Area (ha)
              60
          Area subject to Land use change or Management/Practice change (ha)
              60
          Size
              60
          Size unit
              ha
          Design capacity unit
              m
          Design capacity description
              It is obseved increase of groundwater level is 0.15-0.2 m and decrease of groundwater level fluctation, after the dam building on drainage ditches.
          Basis of design
              not measured
          Constraints
              Due to natural conditions, there was no possibility to use technique and dams were built by hand. Unfortunately the part of the dams is partly washed out by water now and in a result raised bog is not restored as expected.
          Favourable preconditions
              Location in Especially Protected Nature Area and Natura 2000 site
          Public consultation
              1
          Contractural arrangements
              1
          Design contractual arrangement
          | Arrangement type | Responsibility | Role | Comments | Name | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contractual agreement | Development of nature management plan | Development of nature management plan | Latvijas Fund for nature | |
| Contractual agreement | Development of technical design and construction of NWRM | Melioprojekts | 
Design consultation activity
          | Activity stage | Key issues | Name | Comments | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | location of dam sites, changes of groundwater level, impact on habitats | Stackholder consutation | In total 4 stakeholders meetings were organised during the whole elaboration process of nature management plan (elaboration of technical design of NWRM is included). Meeting were attended by local governance, inhabitants, relevant state institutions ect. | 
Design land use change
          | Land use change type | 
|---|
| Peat bogs | 
Design authority
          | Authority type | Role | Responsibility | Name | Comments | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
Lessons, risks, implications...
Key lessons
              The main goal of the implemented NWRM was to restore natural hydrological regime in the drained raised bog located in nature reserve and included in Natura 2000 site. Building of a dam was chosen as most appropriate method to stop artificial drainage. Due to natural conditions, there was no possibility to use technique and heavy machinery, therefore dams were built by hand. Unfortunately a part of the dams is destroyed by waters now and in a result raised bog is not restored as expected. The main lesson for future is to use proper technology for constructing a safer dam.
          Success factor(s)
          | Success factor type | Success factor role | Comments | 
|---|---|---|
| Attitude of relevant stakeholders | main factor | common understanding about nature assets maintenece | 
Financing
          | Financing type | Comments | 
|---|---|
| EU-funds: LIFE+ | |
| National funds | |
| Other | international funds | 
Driver
          | Driver type | Driver role | Comments | 
|---|---|---|
| Other | main driver | izmaiņas hidrol režīmā un biotopa/ veģetācijā | 
Financing share
          | Financing share type | Share | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|
Policy, general governance and design targets
Policy description
              Restoration of degraded area of raised bog thus providing appropriate 
living conditions for plant and animal species, many of them rare and protected in EU
          living conditions for plant and animal species, many of them rare and protected in EU
Quantified objectives
              4.0
          Policy target
          | Target purpose | 
|---|
| Increase Water Storage | 
| Improved Biodiversity | 
| Peak-flow reduction | 
| Runoff control | 
Policy pressure
          | Pressure directive | Relevant pressure | 
|---|
Policy area
          | Policy area type | Policy area focus | Name | Comments | 
|---|
Policy impact
          | Impact directive | Relevant impact | 
|---|
Policy wider plan
          | Wider plan type | Wider plan focus | Name | Comments | 
|---|
Policy requirement directive
          | Requirement directive | Specification | 
|---|
Socio-economic
Direct benefits information
              No direct economical benefits
          Ancillary benefits information
              No additional indirect economical benefits
          Costs investment
              18000
          Costs investment information
              EUR 6000 for technical design, EUR 12 0000 dam building
          Costs operation maintenance
              There is no need for operational costs
          Costs total
              18000
          Costs total information
              Operational costs costs are not foreseen for this measure
          Ecosystem improved biodiversity
              1
          Information on Ecosystem improved biodiversity
              Changes in vegetation are insignificant yet as it takes more time for plants to restore. However, typical raised bog species like bog-moss Sphagnum cuspidatum and cotton-grass Eriophorum vaginatum have begun to dominate percentage cover while the cover of heather Calluna vulgaris has begun to decrease.
          Information on Ecosystem provisioning services
              Not yet. Increase of wild berries (cranberries) is expected
          Ecosystem impact climate regulation
              Not relevant for the specific application
          Biophysical impacts
Information on retained water
              not measured
          Information on increased water storage
              not measured
          Information on runoff reduction
              not measured
          Information on Peak flow rate reduction
              -
          Increased groundwater level
              0.17
          Information on Increased groundwater level
              0.15-0.2 according hydrological motioring data in 2013
          Water quality overall improvements
              Not relevant for this application
          Economic costs income loss unit
              €/ha
          Ecosystem erosion control impact unit
              % reduction
          Soil quality overall soil improvements
              Not relevant for this application
          Information on Soil quality overall soil improvements
              no surveys
          