General
National Id
HU_4
Site name
Csörnöc-Herpenyő river, Vas County, Nádasd village
Summary
There are three measures applied in the national park area primarily for nature rehabilitation, but all measures have water retention aspects. (1) Creating ponds in the forest where run off from forestry roads are collected. The main goal is to create safe breeding ground for reptiles instead of temporary sumps on the roads. (2) Re-vegetating shelterbelts (groves, wetlands) in agricultural land where 50 years ago these landscape elements were destroyed for agro efficiency reasons. (3) Building closures in the drainage channels to enable the flooding of the alder (Alnus) forest and wet meadow to improve their natural quality an important site in the ecological corridor along the stream Csörnöc.
Light or indepth?
Light
NUTS Code
Nyugat-Dunántúl
RBD code
HU1000
Transboundary
0
Data provider
Gábor Ungvári, REKK
NWRM(s) implemented in the case study
Site information
Climate zone
warm temperate moist
Mean annual rainfall
600 - 900 mm
Mean rainfall unit
mm/year
Type
Case Study Info
Monitoring maintenance
Monitoring impacts effects
0
Performance
Performance impact estimation method
Unknown
Design & implementations
Application scale
Field Scale
Age
1
Performance timescale
1 - 4 years
Area subject to Land use change or Management/Practice change (ha)
13100
Favourable preconditions
Positive way: The areas belong to the National Park only small territories were required to be purchased
Design contractual arrangement
| Arrangement type | Responsibility | Role | Comments | Name |
|---|
Design consultation activity
| Activity stage | Key issues | Name | Comments |
|---|
Design land use change
| Land use change type |
|---|
Design authority
| Authority type | Role | Responsibility | Name | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Lessons, risks, implications...
Key lessons
Rehabilitation of habitats where the initial status is still remembered and the land is already publicly owned is a "low hanging fruit" to implement. EU funds have an important role to make these changes happen. While at the same time these good examples are the first but not sufficient elements to initiate similar changes in privately owned agricultural lands
Success factor(s)
| Success factor type | Success factor role | Comments |
|---|---|---|
|
Existing staff and consultant knowledge
|
main factor
|
|
|
Financing possibilities
|
main factor
|
Financing
| Financing type | Comments |
|---|---|
|
EU-funds: Cohesion and regional development funds
|
Driver
| Driver type | Driver role | Comments |
|---|---|---|
|
Organisation committed to it
|
main driver
|
The financial sources provided the possibility for implementing measures that were considered necessary.
|
|
Availability of subsidies
|
main driver
|
Financing share
| Financing share type | Share | Comments |
|---|
Policy, general governance and design targets
Policy description
Environmental degradation due to former agricultural and forestry practices.
Part of wider plan
0
Policy target
| Target purpose |
|---|
|
Improved Biodiversity
|
Policy pressure
| Pressure directive | Relevant pressure |
|---|
Policy area
| Policy area type | Policy area focus | Name | Comments |
|---|
Policy impact
| Impact directive | Relevant impact |
|---|
Policy wider plan
| Wider plan type | Wider plan focus | Name | Comments |
|---|
Policy requirement directive
| Requirement directive | Specification |
|---|
Socio-economic
Costs investment
194400
Costs investment information
EUR 2012 Exchange rate
1st component breeding ponds 22,000€
2nd component habitat mosaics 154,300€
3rd component closures 18,100€
1st component breeding ponds 22,000€
2nd component habitat mosaics 154,300€
3rd component closures 18,100€
Costs capital
194400
Costs land acquisition
2100
Costs land acquisition unit
€ (total value)
Costs operation maintenance
560
Costs operational
260
Costs operational information
1st component cleaning of the ponds
Costs maintenance
300
Costs maintenance information
2nd component for ten years initial care for the new habitat mosaicss
Information on Ecosystem improved biodiversity
1st component: Collected run off in forest provide safe conditions for reptiles to breed - habitat provision. Flood security was not named among the services because the small scale of the sites.
2nd component, habitat mosaics in agricultural land provide habitat service, and amenity services. The nutrient reduction potential was not named.
3rd component the closure of the drainage channel provides stability to the wetland-forest ecosystem (amenities). It also enhances biomass production. Decreasing run off is obvious, but its scale is small in itself.
The site is an important element of the migration path along the stream †“ habitat services.
2nd component, habitat mosaics in agricultural land provide habitat service, and amenity services. The nutrient reduction potential was not named.
3rd component the closure of the drainage channel provides stability to the wetland-forest ecosystem (amenities). It also enhances biomass production. Decreasing run off is obvious, but its scale is small in itself.
The site is an important element of the migration path along the stream †“ habitat services.