General
The Veneto Region, through the “Plan for diffuse pollution prevention and restoration of water in the draining basins of the Venice Lagoon” financed measures of re-calibration of riverbeds aimed at the renaturation of the hydraulic web, to increase the time of permanence of water and phytodepuration processes in the draining basin. In this framework, the Consorzio Acque Risorgive implemented a series of extended interventions on the area under its responsibility. This case study was implemented as part of these interventions.
In particular, it aimed at re-structuring the effluents of the mid course of the Dese river (Rio S. Martino, Rio S. Ambrogio and Scolo Desolino). Such effluents are mostly draining channels, draining water from agricultural fields to the Dese river. The primary objective was the reduction of the amount of N and P reaching the Venice lagoon through phytodepuration. However, at the same time the project carried out the restoration of the draining channel web aimed at reducing flooding issues affecting the area. Over the years, the area has in fact been subject to massive urban development (new residential and industrial areas), with consequent soil sealing and culverted effluents: this had a devastating effect on the hydrological system. The strong floods of 2006 and 2007 on the city of Mestre, for example, were a consequence of this.
The following measures were implemented: (i) Riparian buffer zones; (ii) Creation of wetlands; (iii) River bed enlargement; (iv) Creation and reconnection of floodplain and new buffer strips; and (v) Channel naturalization, creation of new meandering channel.
The ability of the measures to address two pressing environmental issues in the area was a key success factor. The measures proved in fact very effective in reducing nitrogen loads in effluents and, ultimately, into the Venice Lagoon, as well as mitigating flood risk in the area. During the implementation phase, some residents complained for the annoyance (e.g. the dust lifted by the machinery). However, during the first intense precipitation, the rivers/ channels did not overflow (they would have before implementation), so residents understood the key role of measures for flood mitigation. Furthermore, the overall decrease of N levels in the Venice lagoon, which followed the implementation of these and other similar measures in several sites within the draining basin, contributed to gain a positive public perception of these measures.
Site information
Monitoring maintenance
Specific monitoring of N retention was carried out in another site, where similar measures were also implemented by the Consorzio, in the experimental site NICOLAS.
Performance
Design & implementations
Arrangement type | Responsibility | Role | Comments | Name |
---|
Activity stage | Key issues | Name | Comments |
---|
Land use change type |
---|
Authority type | Role | Responsibility | Name | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lessons, risks, implications...
- The ability of the measures to address two pressing environmental issues in the area, while raising environmental quality at the same time, is a key success factor.
- Flooding events significantly decreased after the implementation of measures.
- The measures created pleasant natural environments and residents are now using the area for recreation (walking, biking). This has a great value in an area otherwise dominated by monoculture, with very little natural spaces.
Success factor type | Success factor role | Comments |
---|---|---|
Other
|
main factor
|
The main success factor is the evident effectiveness of the measures! During the implementation phase, some residents complained for the annoyance (e.g. the dust lifted by the machinery). However, during the first intense precipitation, the rivers/ channels didn't overflow (they would have before implementation), so residents understood the key role of measures for flood mitigation. |
Other
|
main factor
|
The ability of the measures to address two pressing environmental issues in the area, while raising environmental quality at the same time, is a key success factor. |
Attitude of the public
|
secondary factor
|
The measures created pleasant natural environments and residents are now using the area for recreation (walking, biking). This has a great value in an area otherwise dominated by monoculture, with very little natural spaces. Furthermore, the possibility of doing recreational activities has raised residents' awareness and interest towards the importance and role of measures, as well as on the importance and value of natural areas. |
Other
|
secondary factor
|
The overall decrease of N levels in the Venice lagoon, which followed the implementation of these and other similar measures in several sites of the draining basin, contributed to gain a positive public perception of these measures. |
Financing possibilities
|
main factor
|
Availability of funds for this type of measures created by the Plan for the Venice Lagoon |
Financing type | Comments |
---|---|
National funds
|
The Veneto Region, through the "Plan for diffuse pollution prevention and restoration of water in the draining basins of the Venice Lagoon" financed measures of re-calibration of riverbeds aimed at the renaturation of the hydraulic web, to increase the time of permanence of water and phytodepuration processes in the draining basin.
|
Driver type | Driver role | Comments |
---|---|---|
Availability of subsidies
|
main driver
|
The Plan for the Venice Lagoon subsidized interventions to reduce eutrophication. The Consorzio chose NWRM because these measures also address flooding issues, quite common in the area
|
Other
|
secondary driver
|
Financing share type | Share | Comments |
---|
Policy, general governance and design targets
- Retain part of the N and P loads from agricultural activities in the basin through phytodepuration ,thus reducing the amount of nutrients reaching the Venice Lagoon (the Lagoon is affected by serious eutrophication issues)
- Reduce the incidence and intensity of flood events in the area. Flooding issues had increased in the decades before the interventions mainly because the sections of the drainage channels were too narrow to contain water discharges in critical periods of the years. When the channels were built, their size was sufficient to contain high discharges, but then the landscape had changed: urban sprawling increased impermeable land, and also agricultural drainage practices (e.g. tubular drainage)had changed increasing discharge into channels.
According to the project's authors, in the framework of integrated landscape planning these two objectives proved to be totally synergic
Total N reduction: 12.73 t/year
Total P reduction: 0.64 t/year
Target purpose |
---|
Pollutants Removal
|
Peak-flow reduction
|
Improved Biodiversity
|
Oher Societal Benefits
|
Pressure directive | Relevant pressure |
---|
Policy area type | Policy area focus | Name | Comments |
---|
Impact directive | Relevant impact |
---|
Wider plan type | Wider plan focus | Name | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Plan for diffuse pollution prevention and restoration of water in the draining basins of the Venice Lagoon
|
The "Plan for diffuse pollution prevention and restoration of water in the draining basins of the Venice Lagoon" (entered into force in 2000) is aimed at addressing the serious eutrophication issues affecting the Venice Lagoon. The draining basin of the Venice Lagoon is in fact characterized by intensive agriculture, responsible for the discharge of large amounts of nutrients (N and P) into the lagoon. The Veneto Region, through the "Plan for diffuse pollution prevention and restoration of water in the draining basins of the Venice Lagoon" financed measures of re-calibration of riverbeds aimed at the renaturation of the hydraulic web, to increase the time of permanence of water and phytodepuration processes in the draining basin.
|
Requirement directive | Specification |
---|
Socio-economic
Biophysical impacts
Total P reduction: 0.64 t/year
Total N reduction: 12.73 t/year