National Id
Sweden_01
Site name
Tullstorpsån
Light or indepth?
In-depth
The in-depth description of the case study
cs-se-01-final_version.pdf
NUTS Code
Sydsverige
RBD code
SE4
Transboundary
0
Data provider
Martyn Futter SLU
Source(s)
www.tullstorpsan.se
NWRM(s) implemented in the case study
Re-meandering
Buffer strips and hedges
Riverbed material renaturalization
Wetland restoration and management
Longitude
13.7666
Latitude
56.2
Climate zone
cool temperate moist
Mean annual rainfall
300 - 600 mm
Mean rainfall unit
mm/year
Average temperature
6
Mean runoff unit
450 - 600 mm
Average runoff coefficient
0,5
Average imperviousness
0,00999999977648258
Type
Case Study Info
Mean annual runoff range
300 - 450 mm
Average slope range
1-2%
Vegetation class
arable agriculture
Application scale
River Basin
Area (ha)
57400
Design contractual arrangement
Arrangement type Responsibility Role Comments Name
Design consultation activity
Activity stage Key issues Name Comments
Design land use change
Land use change type
Design authority
Authority type Role Responsibility Name Comments
Private property owners
Initiation of the measure
Tullstorpsån Economic Association
Farmers
Initiation of the measure
Tullstorpsån Economic Association
Other
Other
Trelleborg Municipality
Municipality, supported Tullstorpsån Economic Association
Other
Financing
Government of Sweden
Other
Financing
EU
Key lessons
Riparian land owners, farmers and other stakeholders must be involved in the decision making process if NWRM aimed at restoring the natural water retention capacity of agricultural landscapes are to be successful.
Success factor(s)
Success factor type Success factor role Comments
Attitude of decision makers

governance framework supported discussion and consensus
Attitude of the public
Attitude of relevant stakeholders

involving landowners, farmers and other businesses was key to success
Financing
Financing type Comments
National funds
Other
EU funds, not clear as to which funding source
Barrier
Barrier type Barrier role Comments
Driver
Driver type Driver role Comments
Legal obligations
secondary driver
WFD and Baltic Sea nutrient reduction commitments
Organisation committed to it
main driver
Financing share
Financing share type Share Comments
Policy target
Target purpose
Pollutants Removal
Improved Biodiversity
Oher Societal Benefits
Increase Water Storage
Policy pressure
Pressure directive Relevant pressure
Policy area
Policy area type Policy area focus Name Comments
Policy impact
Impact directive Relevant impact
Policy wider plan
Wider plan type Wider plan focus Name Comments
Policy requirement directive
Requirement directive Specification
Direct benefits information
not specified
Ancillary benefits information
improved social welfare asociated with amenity ecosystem services
Costs total
1300000
Information on Ecosystem improved biodiversity
improved fish spawning habitat and bird habitat
Information on Ecosystem provisioning services
not specified
Information on Ecosystem impact climate regulation
not specified
Water quality overall improvements
Positive impact-WQ improvement
Information on Water quality overall improvements
design targets for a 30% reduction in N flux and 50% reduciton in P flux from the catchment to the Baltic Sea