General
National Id
Czech_06
Site name
Borova Stream, south-western part of the "Blanskí Les" Protected Landscape area, 5 km north-western from the Chvalšiny village
Summary
Restoration of the length of the Borova stream, increased by 6.3 km a shallow meandering stream bed, where sections of speedily running water alternated with sections of a slow stream were created, financed by the Ministry of Environment of Czech Republic.
NUTS Code
Jihozápad
RBD code
CZ_1000
Transboundary
0
Data provider
Jovanka Ignjatovic
Source(s)
NWRM(s) implemented in the case study
Longitude
14.218
Latitude
48.87638
Site information
Climate zone
cool temperate moist
Mean rainfall
2062
Mean rainfall unit
mm/year
Average temperature
8,60000038146973
Average runoff coefficient
0,170000001788139
Type
Case Study Info
Light or indepth?
Light
Average slope range
1-2%
Monitoring maintenance
Monitoring impacts effects
1
Monitoring parameters
Comparison of composition of macro-invertebrate samples focusing on species richness, species composition, and representation of rare Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera species
Performance
Performance impact estimation method
Catchment outlet
Performance impact estimation information
Benthic macroinvertebrates were sampled using the semiquantitative kick and sweep technique and by hand-picking of specimens from stones and macrophytes.
Design & implementations
Application scale
River
Installation date
2001-01
Lifespan
50
Age
2
Performance timescale
1 - 4 years
Area (ha)
450
Area subject to Land use change or Management/Practice change (ha)
450
Size
3307
Size unit
m
Design capacity description
Increased the total length of the stream 6.3 km
Constraints
The drainage tubing at the surrounding pastures had to remain undisturbed except for the spring area where a small wetland was established.
Favourable preconditions
It was a former meanders channel which was straightened in the 70s
Design contractual arrangement
| Arrangement type | Responsibility | Role | Comments | Name |
|---|
Design consultation activity
| Activity stage | Key issues | Name | Comments |
|---|
Design land use change
| Land use change type |
|---|
Design authority
| Authority type | Role | Responsibility | Name | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lessons, risks, implications...
Key lessons
Morphologically degraded stream sections are typically characterized by low habitat heterogeneity and consequently lower biodiversity compared to more natural sections. These measures certainly increase morphological heterogeneity and mimic the pre-disturbance state. On the other hand, the intervention included substantial disturbance and the use of heavy technique which have seriously affected the biota.
Success factor(s)
| Success factor type | Success factor role | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Financing possibilities
|
main factor
|
Financing
| Financing type | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
|
National funds
|
Ministry of Environment
|
Driver
| Driver type | Driver role | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Organisation committed to it
|
main driver
|
As part of the Blanskí Les Protected Landscape Area
|
|
|
Past flooding events
|
main driver
|
||
|
Availability of subsidies
|
secondary driver
|
Financing share
| Financing share type | Share | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|
Policy, general governance and design targets
Policy description
Large scale regulation of water regime in the landscape was carried out by the consequences of industrial, agricultural, and urban development during the last century.
Part of wider plan
1
Policy target
| Target purpose | |
|---|---|
|
Increase Water Storage
|
|
|
Improved Biodiversity
|
Policy pressure
| Pressure directive | Relevant pressure |
|---|
Policy area
| Policy area type | Policy area focus | Name | Comments |
|---|
Policy impact
| Impact directive | Relevant impact |
|---|
Policy wider plan
| Wider plan type | Wider plan focus | Name | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Program for revitalization of river systems
|
Policy requirement directive
| Requirement directive | Specification |
|---|
Socio-economic
Direct benefits information
Stream increased by 6.3 km alternated with sections of slow stream
Ancillary benefits information
N/A info
Costs investment information
N/A info
Costs operation maintenance
N/A info
Costs total
2954016
Ecosystem improved biodiversity
1
Information on Ecosystem improved biodiversity
Results show that the macroinvertebrate assemblage of the restored section of a small stream contained higher species richness in comparison to channelized conditions that preceded the restoration, especially prominent shortly after the restoration intervention. However, the restoration did not increase abundances of rare Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera species.
Information on Ecosystem provisioning services
Not relevant for this application
Ecosystem impact climate regulation
Not relevant for the specific application
Information on Ecosystem impact climate regulation
Not relevant for this application
Biophysical impacts
Information on retained water
The stream provide enogh flood storage during the flooding time
Information on increased water storage
Creation of lentic sites, increasing the ammount of water retained per timestep
Information on runoff reduction
N/A info
Water quality overall improvements
Not relevant for this application
Information on Water quality overall improvements
Not relevant for this application
Soil quality overall soil improvements
Not relevant for this application
Information on Soil quality overall soil improvements
Not relevant for this application
Thanks to the ministry of environment