General
National Id
Sweden_01
Site name
Tullstorpsån
The in-depth description of the case study
NUTS Code
Sydsverige
RBD code
SE4
Transboundary
0
Data provider
Martyn Futter SLU
Source(s)
NWRM(s) implemented in the case study
Longitude
13.7666
Latitude
56.2
Site information
Climate zone
cool temperate moist
Mean annual rainfall
300 - 600 mm
Mean rainfall unit
mm/year
Average temperature
6
Mean runoff unit
450 - 600 mm
Average runoff coefficient
0,5
Average imperviousness
0,00999999977648258
Type
Case Study Info
Light or indepth?
In-depth
Mean annual runoff range
300 - 450 mm
Average slope range
1-2%
Vegetation class
arable agriculture
Design & implementations
Application scale
River Basin
Area (ha)
57400
Design contractual arrangement
| Arrangement type | Responsibility | Role | Comments | Name |
|---|
Design consultation activity
| Activity stage | Key issues | Name | Comments |
|---|
Design land use change
| Land use change type |
|---|
Design authority
| Authority type | Role | Responsibility | Name | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lessons, risks, implications...
Key lessons
Riparian land owners, farmers and other stakeholders must be involved in the decision making process if NWRM aimed at restoring the natural water retention capacity of agricultural landscapes are to be successful.
Success factor(s)
| Success factor type | Success factor role | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Attitude of decision makers
|
governance framework supported discussion and consensus |
||
|
Attitude of the public
|
|||
|
Attitude of relevant stakeholders
|
involving landowners, farmers and other businesses was key to success |
Financing
| Financing type | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
|
National funds
|
||
|
Other
|
EU funds, not clear as to which funding source
|
Driver
| Driver type | Driver role | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Legal obligations
|
secondary driver
|
WFD and Baltic Sea nutrient reduction commitments
|
|
|
Organisation committed to it
|
main driver
|
Financing share
| Financing share type | Share | Comments |
|---|
Policy, general governance and design targets
Policy target
| Target purpose | |
|---|---|
|
Pollutants Removal
|
|
|
Improved Biodiversity
|
|
|
Oher Societal Benefits
|
|
|
Increase Water Storage
|
Policy pressure
| Pressure directive | Relevant pressure |
|---|
Policy area
| Policy area type | Policy area focus | Name | Comments |
|---|
Policy impact
| Impact directive | Relevant impact |
|---|
Policy wider plan
| Wider plan type | Wider plan focus | Name | Comments |
|---|
Policy requirement directive
| Requirement directive | Specification |
|---|
Socio-economic
Direct benefits information
not specified
Ancillary benefits information
improved social welfare asociated with amenity ecosystem services
Costs total
1300000
Information on Ecosystem improved biodiversity
improved fish spawning habitat and bird habitat
Information on Ecosystem provisioning services
not specified
Information on Ecosystem impact climate regulation
not specified
Biophysical impacts
Water quality overall improvements
Positive impact-WQ improvement
Information on Water quality overall improvements
design targets for a 30% reduction in N flux and 50% reduciton in P flux from the catchment to the Baltic Sea
