Fortuna Restoration Project in the Danube Delta, Romania

National Id
Romania_03
Site name
The Fortuna -Danube Delta
Summary
The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority had the aim with the Fortuna Wetland Restoration Project of connecting agricultural polder Fortuna (2,115 ha), Romania, to the Danube regime, restoration of hydrological regime and hydrological functions.
NUTS Code
Sud-Est
RBD code
RO1000
Transboundary
0
Data provider
Bogdan Barbu, RECImola Koszta, REC
Source(s)
The Fortuna Restoration Project
Romanian Experiences Regarding Ecological Restoration in Danube Floodplain and Delta
The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve
Romanian Danube Delta Biodiversity Project Local Benefits
NWRM(s) implemented in the case study
Wetland restoration and management
Re-meandering
Reconnection of oxbow lakes and similar features
Elimination of riverbank protection
Longitude
29.148056
Latitude
45.191111
Climate zone
warm temperate dry
Mean rainfall
400
Mean rainfall unit
mm/year
Average temperature
11,1999998092651
Type
Case Study Info
Light or indepth?
Light
Vegetation class
former polder for agro-forestry
Monitoring impacts effects
1
Application scale
Field Scale
Installation date
2004-11
Lifespan
50
Age
10
Performance timescale
Immediate
Area (ha)
2115
Area subject to Land use change or Management/Practice change (ha)
2115
Constraints
The villagers in Gorgova have strongly opposed the measure of closing channels leading to the Lake Fortuna, because it makes access by boat more difficult for them.
Design contractual arrangement
Arrangement type Responsibility Role Comments Name
Design consultation activity
Activity stage Key issues Name Comments
Design land use change
Land use change type
Design authority
Authority type Role Responsibility Name Comments
National water authority
Other
Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development Tulcea - Romania
Research, design, monitoring
National water authority
Other
The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority
Civil works for implementation
Other
Other
RIZA- Lelystad, The Netherland
'Research, design, monitoring
NGO
Other
WWF - Auen Institute, Rastatt, Germany
'Research, design, monitoring
National water authority
Financing
Romanian Ministry of Agriculture, Forests, Waters and Environment Romania
Other
Financing
World Bank
Managing Agency, Financing
Other
Other
Tulcea County Council
Other
Other
Local stakeholders - the professional fishermen
Project-Affected people
Key lessons
The epxeriences learned in the project emphasize the importance of securing the support of local communities for conservation programs . Also self sustainability of the restored area is a very important factor.
Success factor(s)
Success factor type Success factor role Comments
Financing
Financing type Comments
Barrier
Barrier type Barrier role Comments
Other
secondary barrier
From a local benefits perspective, villagers in Gorgova have strongly opposed the measure of closing channels leading to the Lake Fortuna, because it makes access by boat more difficult from them.
Lacking coordination between authorities
main barrier
Land "ownership" (too many administrators); legal framework; lack of money; lack of coordination (national level); lack of vision; lack of co-operation.
Attitude of decision makers
Other
secondary barrier
Restored area not self sustaining;
Driver
Driver type Driver role Comments
Financing share
Financing share type Share Comments
Quantified objectives
1. Protect and maintain population of species and habitats with ecological values. 2. Carry out restoration works where natural and seminatural character has been lost. 3. Manage water circulation in order to improve the ecological conditions. 4. Assess the effectiveness of existing buffer zones and if necessary recommend modifications.
Part of wider plan
1
Policy target
Target purpose
Improved Biodiversity
Increase Water Storage
Oher Societal Benefits
Policy pressure
Pressure directive Relevant pressure
Policy area
Policy area type Policy area focus Name Comments
Policy impact
Impact directive Relevant impact
Policy wider plan
Wider plan type Wider plan focus Name Comments
Local
Environment & Biodiversity
The Rehabilitation Programme
Wetland Restoration Projects
Policy requirement directive
Requirement directive Specification
Direct benefits information
Fish yield; Reed harvest; Tourism; Cattle.
Ancillary benefits information
n.a. info
Costs investment information
n.a. info
Costs operation maintenance
n.a. info
Costs total information
n.a. info
Ecosystem improved biodiversity
1
Information on Ecosystem improved biodiversity
- Habitat for plants and animals typical alluvial areas; - Habitat and breeding area for fish and aquatic birds; - Reservoir for biodiversity and providing genetic resources; - Biocoridor and genetic exchange;
Ecosystem impact climate regulation
No information available
Information on retained water
n.a. info
Information on increased water storage
n.a. info
Information on runoff reduction
n.a. info
Ecosystem erosion control
0
Water quality overall improvements
Positive impact-WQ improvement
Information on Water quality overall improvements
Retention of sediments and pollutions; Black Sea biofilter.
Soil quality overall soil improvements
Positive impact-SQ improvement
Information on Soil quality overall soil improvements
Organic production; Biogeochemical circuit elements

Partners

Logos of all partners of NWRM project